Medicaid Contract Purchasing SpecificationsChildren with Special Health Care NeedsPart 2.Delivery of Services for Children with Special Health Care Needs[Download a .pdf version of this document]§201. Enrollment and Disenrollment §201. Enrollment and Disenrollment (a) Enrollment and Disenrollment Procedures
(b) Duties Related to Children Receiving Treatment at Time of Enrollment In the case of a child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) who at the time of enrollment is receiving services under an IEP (as defined under §108(f)) or IFSP (as defined under §108(g)), Contractor shall comply with the requirements of §105(d). (c) Duties Related to Children at Time of Disenrollment Contractor shall comply with the requirements of §§204-205 of MEDICAIDSPECS. (d) Voluntary Disenrollment
(e) Involuntary Disenrollment41 Commentary: The following illustrative language assumes that under the States Medicaid program, the authority to disenroll a beneficiary from an MCO rests with the Purchaser Medicaid Agency, or with the enrollment broker used by the Agency, but not with the MCO.
§202. Information to Enrolled Children Commentary: The following illustrative language would require Contractor to provide information to newly enrolled children with special health care needs through an enrollee handbook (including content and understandability requirements), a provider directory, and other means specified in the illustrative language at Part 3 of MEDICAIDSPECS, www.gwu.edu/~chsrp. Subsection (b) would supplement these generic requirements for an enrollee handbook with additional elements specific to children with special health care needs. (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 3 of MEDICAIDSPECS to the extent consistent with the requirements of this section. (b) Contents of Enrollee Handbook Contractors enrollee handbook shall contain the following information relating to the delivery of services for a child with special health care needs:
§203. Provider Selection and Assignment (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 4 of MEDICAIDSPECS to the extent consistent with the requirements of this section. Commentary: The following illustrative language would require Contractors to give families and caregivers of enrolled children the option of choosing as the childs primary care provider for their medical home either (1) a primary care practitioner or (2) a physician who is trained as a specialist in pediatrics, including a pediatric medical subspecialist and a pediatric surgical specialist, termed a pediatric professional as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The language would also require Contractors to ensure access by enrolled children to appropriate pediatric specialists for specialty services. While there is some overlap between pediatric professionals and pediatric specialists, the latter category includes practitioners and clinics other than pediatricians, including child psychiatrists and psychologists. For further detail, see §§108(i) and (k). (b) Selection of a Primary Care Provider In the case of an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)), Contractor shall offer the family or caregiver of such enrolled child (or in the case of an adolescent, the adolescent) the option of designating as the childs primary care provider a provider described in paragraph (1) who meets the requirements of paragraph (2).
Commentary: The following illustrative language assumes voluntary enrollment by a child with special health care needs into the MCO. In states operating Medicaid managed care programs under a § 1932 state plan option, children with special needs are expressly exempted from mandatory enrollment, including auto- or default enrollment, into an MCO, §1932(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security, 42 U.S.C. §1396u-2(a)(2)(A). Under the illustrative language below, a child would be assigned to a primary care provider by the MCO only if the child had voluntarily enrolled in the MCO and, having been offered a choice of primary care providers under subsection (b) above, had not selected a primary care provider within a specified period of time. (c) Assignment of Non-Selecting Children to Primary Care Providers Consistent with §403(a)(2)(B) of MEDICAIDSPECS, in the event that the family or caregiver of an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) (or in the case of an adolescent, the adolescent) does not select a primary care provider under subsection (b) within [ ] days of enrollment, Contractor shall assign the enrolled child to:
(d) Reselection of a Primary Care Provider In the case of an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) who has selected (or been assigned to) a primary care provider under subsections (b) and (c), if the primary provider is no longer willing to assume the responsibilities of a primary care provider for the child, Contractor shall:
(e) Reassignment of a Child with Special Health Care Needs to a Primary Care Provider
(f) No Pediatric Specialist Available as Specialty Care Provider45 Commentary: This illustrative language addresses the inability of an enrolled child with special health care needs to find an accessible pediatric specialist who participates in Contractors provider network to treat the child's special health care needs in a timely manner. In such a circumstance, the language below suggests three alternatives: (1) the MCO could refer the child to an appropriate pediatric specialist not participating in the network; (2) the child's family or caregiver could select a non-participating pediatric specialist; or (3) the child could be allowed to disenroll. Purchasers and potential Contractors should review these alternatives carefully for operational and fiscal feasibility in light emerging state case law on institutional negligence (see Jones v. Chicago HMO LTD., Illinois Supreme Court (Docket No. 86830, May 18, 2000).
§204. Provider Network (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of:
(b) Primary Care Providers Consistent with §502 of MEDICAIDSPECS, Contractor shall ensure that the number of primary care providers (as defined in §108(k)) participating in Contractors provider network (or accessible through out-of-network arrangements) is sufficient, consistent with the travel time and service waiting time requirements of §205(b), to enable Contractor to meet its duty under §101(a) to provide a medical home to each enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)). In determining sufficiency, Contractor may include pediatric professionals (as defined in §108(i)) selected by families or caregivers under §203(b)(1)(A). (c) Pediatric Specialists Contractor shall ensure that the number of pediatric specialists (as defined in §108(j)) participating in Contractors provider network (or accessible through out-of-network arrangements) is sufficient, consistent with the travel time and service waiting time requirements of §205(c), to enable each enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) to have access under §105(c)(4) and §205(c) to an appropriate pediatric specialist for specialist services identified in the childs care plan under §105(b).47 (d) Care Coordinators Participating in Contractors Provider Network Contractor shall include in its provider network a number of care coordinators (as defined in §108(b)) that is sufficient to ensure that each care coordinator shall be responsible under §104(d) for no greater than [ ]48 enrolled children with special health care needs at any given time. (e) Composition of Provider Network Commentary: In general, MCOs have two options for developing the provider capacity to deliver covered services to enrollees. They could recruit all of the needed primary care and specialist practitioners and facilities into one or more provider networks. Or, in cases where they are unable to recruit the necessary type or number of providers into their networks, they could arrange for referrals of enrollees to out-of-network providers. From the MCOs standpoint, the inclusion of practitioners and facilities in their provider networks is generally preferable because it gives them more ability to control the cost and quality of the services which they have contracted to deliver. From the purchasers standpoint, the most important consideration would be ensuring that the necessary practitioners and facilities are accessible to enrolled beneficiaries for covered services in a timely manner, and that if the necessary practitioners are not participating in contractors network, they are actually accessible to enrollees. The following illustrative language is drafted to permit purchasers and contractors to negotiate among these different options. For example, a purchaser and contractor could agree that sufficient numbers of each of the necessary types of providers will be included in the contractors network. They could then use subsection (g) as a checklist for delineating the desired composition of the network. If all provider types so designated were included in the contractor's network, the language at subsection (f) regarding out-of-network arrangements would be unnecessary. In the alternative, a purchaser and contractor might decide that particular types of providers cannot, given market circumstances, realistically be recruited into the contractors provider network. In such cases, language such as that suggested at subsection (f) may be necessary to ensure the accessibility of such out-of-network providers to enrollees.
(f) Out-of-Network Arrangements
Commentary: The following illustrative language is intended to allow purchasers and contractors to negotiate the types of providers that contractor will make available to enrolled children with special health care needs. As discussed above, these providers may participate in contractor's provider network or may furnish services out of network. The mix between participating and out-of-network providers will vary over time depending upon market conditions, provider preferences, contractor business strategies, and other factors. The listing of providers identified in the following paragraphs (1) through (3) is found in Peggy McManus, Maternal and Child Health Policy Research Center, Evaluating Managed Care Plans for Children with Special Health Needs: A Purchasers Tool, www.ichp.edu. Note that under the illustrative language at §205, contractors would also be subject to requirements relating to sufficient numbers of certain types of providers to ensure accessibility to covered services. (g) Types of Providers For purposes of subsections (e) and (f), the types of providers described in this subsection are:
(h) Provider Selection and Retention Consistent with §501(c) of MEDICAIDSPECS, Contractor:
(i) Reimbursement Purchasers may find it useful to review Negotiating the New Health System (3rd Ed.) which provides other options relating to payment terms used by state agency purchasers in contracting with Medicaid MCOs in 1996. These options may be found at Table 7.2, Vol. 2, Part 4, pages, 7-94 through 7-174, www.gwu.edu/~chsrp.
Commentary: §1932(f) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1396u-2(f) requires that MCOs pay health care providers for delivering items and services covered under Medicaid risk contracts on a timely basis consistent with §1902(a)(37)(A) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.§1396a(a)(37)(A) (e.g., 90 percent of clean claims are paid within 30 days of receipt), unless the provider and the MCO agree to an alternate payment schedule.
§204A. Medical Home Commentary: As discussed in the commentary before §101, the pediatric standard of care for children with special health care needs is that of a medical home an approach to providing care that is accessible, family-centered, comprehensive, continuous, coordinated, compassionate, and culturally competent. See AAP, Managed Care and Children with Special Needs: Medical Home Checklist (1998), http://www.aap.org/advocacy/medhome/resourcesmedhomechecklist.htm. The illustrative language in Part 1 sets forth the Contractor's duties to operate in a manner consistent with the medical home approach. This section addresses the duties of individual network providers to furnish a medical home to such children in their practices through the written agreement between the Contractor and the provider. The Purchaser, while not a party to these written agreements, may specify minimum requirements for such agreements through the main purchasing agreement with Contractor. These requirements would ensure that the elements of the purchasing agreement that affect the medical home approach -- e.g., guidelines (§106), access standards (§205), and care coordination (§105) -- apply directly to the providers who serve as primary care providers for such children (whether these providers are primary care providers or pediatric specialists). (a) In General Consistent with §501(b) of Part 5 of MEDICAIDSPECS, Contractor shall enter into and maintain an enforceable written agreement with each provider participating in Contractors provider network that meets the requirements of subsection (b) and the requirements of §204(i) (relating to reimbursement). (b) Written Agreements with Providers50 The enforceable written agreement between Contractor and a provider participating in Contractor's provider network shall:
(c) Provider's Duty to Furnish a Medical Home The duties of a provider participating in Contractor's provider network who functions as a primary care provider with respect to an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) are to:
§205. Access Standards Commentary: Many contracts between State Medicaid agencies and MCOs contain language relating to the accessibility of covered services. See CHRSP, Negotiating the New Health System, 3rd Edition (1999), Table 3.7, Volume 3, Part 2, pp. 3-358 - 3-441. For illustrative language on access standards for all populations by type of service (e.g., preventive, routine, and specialty services), see CHSRP, Optional Purchasing Specifications: Access to Services (June 2000), Part A-1. Both references can be found at www.gwu.edu/~chsrp. The following illustrative language is specific to access by children with special health care needs to primary care providers and to pediatric specialists. It is designed to be incorporated into contractual access provisions of more general applicability. (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 6 of MEDICAIDSPECS to the extent the requirements are consistent with this section. Commentary: For a summary of primary care provider access standards (including capacity requirements) used by 6 states (Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Mexico), see Table 9, pp. 82-85, of Kaye et al., Certain Children with Special Health Care Needs: An Assessment of State Activities and Their Relationship to HCFA's Interim Criteria, National Academy for State Health Policy, (June 2000) http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/needsrpt.pdf. (b) Access to Primary Care Providers
(c) Access to Pediatric Specialists for Specialty Services Commentary: A number of states have enacted legislation that impose standards on MCOs with respect to patient access to specialists. For a recent summary of these provisions, see Molly Stauffer, National Conference of State Legislatures, 2000 State by State Guide to Managed Care Law (September 1999), Table 2-4, and Families USA Foundation, Hit and Miss: State Managed Care Laws (July 1998), Table 1, www.familiesusa.org. Interested purchasers should consider the following illustrative language in light of any appropriate state law.
§206. Relationships with Other State and Local Agencies53 Commentary: This section sets forth illustrative language for memoranda of understanding between contracting MCOs and state agencies other than the purchaser that have responsibility for children with special health care needs. These are: state Title V CSHCN agencies, state substance abuse and mental health agencies, and state educational agencies. There are other state agencies that have responsibility for children with special health care needs, including state child welfare agencies and state developmental disabilities agencies. For illustrative language setting forth memoranda of understanding between contractor and these agencies, see §707 and §708, respectively, of Part 7 of MEDICAIDSPECS. Note also that HCFA, in a letter to State Medicaid Directors dated November 25, 1998, observed that Medicaid agencies have an opportunity to work with Ryan White grantees and managed care organizations to ensure a continuum of care for persons with HIV disease that avoids duplication of services and provides optimal service by qualified providers to beneficiaries. See www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/smd-11258.htm. For a summary of requirements for coordination agreements by MCOs with state agencies 6 states (Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Mexico), see Table 15, pp. 136-138, of Kaye et al., Certain Children with Special Health Care Needs: An Assessment of State Activities and Their Relationship to HCFA's Interim Criteria, National Academy for State Health Policy (June 2000), http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/needsrpt.pdf. (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 7 of MEDICAIDSPECS, to the extent consistent with the requirements of this section. (b) Relationship with State Title V Program for Children with Special Health Care Needs Commentary: The following illustrative language addresses the relationship between contractor and the division within the State Title V agency that administers the CSHCN program. For illustrative language relating to the non-CSHCN Title V populations, see §703 of Part 7 of MEDICAIDSPECS. Some State Title V CSHCN Programs pay for or provide medical care directly to children with special health care needs; others furnish care coordination and referrals but do not pay for or provide medical care. The following illustrative language is designed to accommodate both types of arrangements.
Commentary: State Title V Agencies are required to report annually on their progress toward achieving the targets they set for 18 national Performance Measures and 6 Outcome Measures. Performance Measure #2 concerns the degree to which the State Title V CSHCN Program provides or pays for specialty and subspecialty services, including care coordination, not otherwise accessible or affordable to its clients. See www.mchdata.net. The illustrative language in subsection (c) is designed to enable interested Purchasers to ensure that their State Title V CSHCN Program receives the information it needs to assess its progress on Performance Measure #2 directly from the Contractor. In the alternative, Purchasers may wish to require that Contractors report the necessary information to them so that they can transfer it to the State Title V CSHCN Program. For illustrative language reflecting this alternative approach, see §208(c).
(c) Relationship with State Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency Commentary: The following illustrative language also appears in §709 of MEDICAIDSPECS.
(d) Relationship with State Education Agency and Part C Lead Agency Commentary: The following illustrative language could be used to frame a memorandum of agreement between a Medicaid MCO and the State Educational Agency or Part C Lead Agency. Of course, Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) also play a role in the development and implementation of IEPs for children with disabilities. In some states, LEAs participate in the Medicaid program as providers and are reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis for the covered services they furnish to eligible children under IEPs. Because there could be numerous LEAs within the service area of a Medicaid MCO, particularly if it enrolls children throughout the state, and because not all of those LEAs may have significant numbers of Medicaid-eligible children with IEPs, the following language does not address agreements between MCOs and LEAs. Interested purchasers could, however, modify the following language to encourage memoranda of understanding between MCOs and one or more of the LEAs within their service areas. In addition, an MCO may choose to include an LEA as a provider in the MCOs provider network; in this circumstance, the written provider agreement provisions under §204(h)(2) could apply. This illustrative language may also be found in §706 of MEDICAIDSPECS.
§207. Quality Measurement and Improvement56 Commentary: The following illustrative language assumes that the costs to Contractors of conducting quality measurement and improvement activities, including the clinical focus studies specified by Purchaser, will be factored into the capitation rate paid by Purchaser to Contractor on behalf of each enrolled child with special health care needs. For a summary of performance measures used by 6 states (Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Mexico), see Table 11, pp. 105-108 of Kaye et al., Certain Children with Special Health Care Needs: An Assessment of State Activities and Their Relationship to HCFA's Interim Criteria, National Academy for State Health Policy,(June 2000) http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/needsrpt.pdf. (a) In General57 Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 858 of MEDICAIDSPECS to the extent consistent with the requirements of this section. (b) Clinical Focus Studies Contractor shall, on a [ ] basis, conduct, or arrange for the conduct of, the following focus studies relating to the furnishing of clinical services under §103(a) to children with special health care needs (as defined §108(c)):
(c) Other Focus Studies Contractor shall, on a [ ] basis, conduct, or arrange for the conduct of, the following focus studies relating to the availability and accessibility of services under §103(a) to children with special health care needs (as defined §108(c)):
§208. Data Collection and Reporting60 (a) In General Contractor shall comply with:
Commentary: The following illustrative language assumes Contractor is collecting and reporting encounter data, as articulated in §907 of MEDICAIDSPECS. A recent GAO analysis reaffirmed that encounter data regarding patients with disabilities "is essential for effective monitoring. The information can play an important role in quality assurance, estimates of future service use, research, and program planning. Developing comprehensive, consistent data on services provided under capitated managed care takes time and effort, and can be expensive. However, it can permit states to identify areas in which service utilization rates are overly low or high." General Accounting Office, Medicaid Managed Care: Challenges In Implementing Safeguards for Children with Special Needs (March 2000) GAO/HEHS-00-37, p. 31, www.gao.gov. Of course, the precise definition of encounter data tends to vary from state to state. One purpose of the following language is to provide a checklist of data elements relating to children with special health care needs from which purchasers may wish to draw in designing their general requirements relating to encounter data collection and reporting. Another option for purchasers would be to supplement their general encounter data collection by requiring contractors to report data specific to children with special health care needs that the state is not already collecting. The following illustrative language would accommodate both approaches to avoiding duplication of data requirements. (b) Data Specific to Children with Special Health Care Needs62 Contractor shall collect and report to Purchaser, on a [ ] basis, in such form and manner as Purchaser specifies, the following data (to the extent that such data are not required under the encounter data provisions of §907 of MEDICAIDSPECS):
Commentary: State Title V Agencies report annually on their progress toward achieving the targets they set for 18 national Performance Measures and 6 national Outcome Measures with respect to the children with special health care needs for whom they have responsibility. See www.mchdata.net. One approach to collecting this information is reflected in §206(b)(2), under which Contractors would report this data directly to the State Title V CSHCN Program. The illustrative language below embodies an alternative approach under which the Contractor reports to the Purchaser the data that the State Title V CSHCN Program requires in order to prepare its progress reports. The illustrative language would require that the data be supplied to Purchaser because the Title V CSHCN Agency is not a party to the purchasing agreement; however, Purchasers may establish arrangements for transfer of this data to the Title V CSHCN Agency under the interagency agreement under §1902(a)(11)(B) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1396a(a)(11)(B). (c) Data Relating to National Title V Performance and Outcome Measures Contractor shall collect and report to Purchaser, on a [ ] basis, in such form and manner as Purchaser specifies, the data required by the [Title V CSHCN Agency] to report on its progress in achieving the State targets for performance and outcomes under Title V of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §701 et seq. §209. Enrolled Child Safeguards 63 (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of:
(b) Unnecessary Inquiries Consistent with §009(d) of MEDICAIDSPECS, Contractor shall ensure that any communication with an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) does not make unnecessary inquiries into the existence of a disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.65 (c) Due Process Contractor shall comply with the requirements of §1902(a)(3) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1396a(a)(3), and implementing regulations at 42 C.F.R. §§431.200 et seq., relating to notice, fair hearing, and continuation of coverage rights of an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) in the event of:
(d) Confidentiality Protections for Enrolled Adolescents Contractor shall comply with §1002 of Part 10 of MEDICAIDSPECS. (e) Other Safeguards for Children with Special Health Care Needs Contractor shall comply with:
§210. Remedies for Noncompliance (a) In General Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 12 of MEDICAIDSPECS. (b) Enrolled Children as Intended Third Party Beneficiaries Contractor agrees and affirms that an enrolled child with special health care needs (as defined in §108(c)) is an intended third-party beneficiary to [drafter insert name of purchasing document], and that such child, and the childs family or caregiver on the childs behalf, is entitled to all of the rights and remedies available to third party beneficiaries under state or other law.66 §211. Other Applicable Federal and State Requirements Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Part 13 of MEDICAIDSPECS. Endnotes
|
Commentary: The selection of primary care providers and pediatric specialists is an issue of great importance to children with special health care needs and their families. There are two basic approaches to beneficiary choice in Medicaid managed care. The more common is to offer the beneficiary a choice between two or more MCOs and, once enrolled in an MCO, a choice among primary care providers. The other approach is to offer the beneficiary a choice among primary care providers and, once that selection has been made, to assign a beneficiary to an MCO based on its affiliation with the provider. Both of these approaches are reflected in Part 4 of MEDICAIDSPECS, referenced in §203 below.
The following illustrative language can be used by purchasers in implementing either approach. However, in the case of purchasers that elect to offer a choice between MCOs, the criteria under which beneficiaries choose among plans (rather than practitioners) would not be reflected in an agreement such as this between a purchaser and an MCO. Instead, they might set forth in an agreement between a purchaser and an enrollment broker or in state Medicaid plan provisions or regulations. The AAP recommends that every effort is made for Medicaid beneficiaries to make an informed choice when choosing a managed care plan. Such efforts should include the use of face-to-face counselors. When participants do not choose, and must be assigned to a plan, the criteria used to assign them should include current and previous relationships with primary care and specialty clinicians, location of clinicians, assignment of other family or household members, choices by other members in the service area, and capacity of managed care organizations to provide special care or services appropriate for the participants.
See AAP's Medicaid Policy Statement, http://www.aap.org/policy/RE9918.html.