Requiring health care workers to be vaccinated against influenza is one strategy for reducing its spread in health care settings. SPHHS has released a report that reviews the arguments for and against such mandates, given the risks of influenza in health care settings, the availability of safe and effective vaccines to reduce that risk, and the inadequate health care worker compliance with immunization recommendations (fewer than 50% comply). The report is available at http://www.gwumc.edu/sphhs/about/rapidresponse/index.cfm
Christine Ferguson, J.D., research professor, and Anna Muldoon, M.P.H. candidate, research assistant, published "Not All are Created Equal: Differences in Obesity Attitudes Between Men and Women" in the Sept./Oct. 2009 issue of the journal Women’s Health Issues. The invited commentary, written on behalf of the STOP Obesity Alliance, explores sources and effects of stigma in several environments and attitudinal differences between men and women when it comes to obesity interventions and perceptions. The commentary is available at http://www.whijournal.com/article/S1049-3867(09)00069-3/fulltext
A new article titled "A four-system comparison of patients with chronic illness: the Military Health System, Veterans Health Administration, Medicaid, and commercial plans" has been published by a team of researchers from Thomson Reuters, the Veteran's Administration, Massachusetts General Hospital, and our own Julia Hidalgo, Ph.D., in Military Medicine 174(9).
Sara Rosenbaum, J.D., Hirsh Professor of Health Law & Policy and DHP chair, was a co-author of "Evidence Of An Emerging Digital Divide Among Hospitals That Care For The Poor" which appears as a Health Affairs on-line exclusive. The article explores the growing digital divide in the U.S., noting that hospitals that provide care to large numbers of poor patients also had minimal use of EHRs. It is available at http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.28.6.w1160/DC1
Professor Rosenbaum also wrote a blog for the O'Neill Institutes Legal Solutions in Health Reform blog. "It's the sick, stupid" looks at the importance of protections of protecting the sick from discrimination by insurers in health reform legislation, and is available at http://oneillhealthreform.wordpress.com/
Alexandra Stewart, J.D., published invited commentary regarding the introduction of the HPV vaccine in the U.S. in the British Journal of Healthcare Management (Vol 15 No 11, 2009). Please contact Ms. Stewart if you would like a copy of the article.
Awards & Acknowledgments
The WSJ referenced the recent DHP report "Using Primary Care to Bend the Curve: Estimating the Impact of
a Health Center Expansion on Health Care Costs," in an article on federally funded health centers and their financial struggles in time of patient load growth. The story can is available at online.wsj.com/article/SB125409659506345101.html The report also received prominent mention in the House reform bills' Trust Fund to grow CHCs.
Department of Health Policy Senior Fellow Margaret Dunkle has been appointed Co-Chair of the Committee on Early Identification and Treatment of the North Los Angeles County Autism Regional Task Force.
On October 22nd, Leighton Ku, Ph.D., spoke about Latino children's health at the National Council of La Raza's symposium titled "Investing in Our Future: The State of Latino Children and Youth." Other speakers included HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Senator Bob Menendez, and Marian Wright Edelman of the Children's Defense Fund.
The NY Times reviewed "Technological Medicine," a collection of essays on medical technology by Stanley Joel Reiser, M.D., M.P.A., Ph.D., clinical professor. The review is available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/27books.html?_r=1&ref=health and it is quite good!
David Stevens, M.D., F.A.A.F.M., research professor and Director of Quality, NACHC, addressed the October 20th Cabot Primary Care Lecture Series on "Community Health Centers: America's Health Care Home."
New Analyses of Senate HELP and Finance Committee Health Reform Proposals Addresses Significant Legal Changes
23/10/2009
WASHINGTON – New analyses of the Senate HELP and Finance Committees’ Health Reform proposals examine significant legal changes to the financing and delivery of health care included in these measures. The analyses are part of an ongoing project of The George Washington University Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program, within the School of Public Health and Health Services (SPHHS), to advance public understanding of the legal dimensions of national health reform.
Building on the comparative analyses of previous health reform proposals, the analysis of the Senate HELP Committee’s Affordable Health Choices Act (S. 1679) focuses on legal changes to the structure of the individual and group insurance markets and related coverage provisions. For the Chairman’s Mark of the America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009 (S. 1796), the analysis includes a comprehensive examination of the key legal changes that impact not only coverage, but the ways in which health care is organized and delivered.
“This analysis reflects the enormous progress toward health reform that has been made over the past weeks. With the merger of these two bills, the House and Senate are poised to launch a historic national policy debate,” said Sara Rosenbaum, Hirsh Professor of Health Law and Policy and Chair of the Department of Health Policy. Professor Jane Hyatt Thorpe, who directs the comparative analysis project for the Hirsh Program, added, “These analyses examine the critical legal issues that will largely define the debate, and are designed to help policy makers, health professionals, and consumers understand their scope and meaning.”
The comparative analyses use a special health reform legal taxonomy developed by GW Hirsh Program faculty and staff. The taxonomy is an analytic tool that provides a uniform and consistent mechanism for understanding in detail the key elements of health reform, including access, coverage, affordability, quality, health, financing, and the organization of health care markets, across the various proposals. The taxonomy is used to generate an analytic and comparative analysis of the various proposals that can be viewed independently or comparatively (side by side) in a user-friendly format to provide a consistent and comparative understanding of each legislative proposal.
In addition to the Senate HELP Committee’s Affordable Health Choices Act and the Senate Finance Chairman’s Mark of the America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009, the taxonomy has been used to analyze the House Tri-Committee Bill, The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act (H.R. 3200); the Healthy Americans Act (S. 391); the Patient’s Choice Act (S. 1099); and the American Health Security Act of 2009 (S. 703). Future additions will include legislative proposals as they emerge from the Senate and Congress. The comparative analysis and interactive tool is available on the Department of Health Policy’s Web site at www.gwumc.edu/sphhs/departments/healthpolicy/healthreform
About Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program
The Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program, one of the largest law and health policy educational endeavors in the nation, was established in 1997 and endowed by Dr. and Mrs. Harold and Jane Hirsh. Located in The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services Department of Health Policy, the program offers unique educational opportunities designed to provide a solid grounding in health law and policy to candidates for law degrees, practicing lawyers who seek to specialize in health law and policy, and health policy students. Through an interdisciplinary approach, the program advances understanding of how the law influences all phases of health care, health policy and public health, and how the changing health care system affects traditional areas of the law. The program also prepares participants for a broad range of health law-related careers.
About The George Washington University Medical Center
The George Washington University Medical Center is an internationally recognized interdisciplinary academic health center that has consistently provided high-quality medical care in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area since 1824. The Medical Center comprises the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, the 11th oldest medical school in the country; the School of Public Health and Health Services, the only such school in the nation’s capital; GW Hospital, jointly owned and operated by a partnership between The George Washington University and a subsidiary of Universal Health Services, Inc.; and the GW Medical Faculty Associates, an independent faculty practice plan. For more information on GWUMC, visit www.gwumc.edu
DHP Publications in the News!
15/10/2009
Sara Rosenbaum, J.D., Hirsh Professor of Health Law & Policy and Department chair, authored two studies published this week. The first, "Medicaid Payment Rate Lawsuits: Evolving Court Views Mean Uncertain Future for Medi-Cal," looks at the lengthy history of medical provider rate litigation. In a one year period beginning in April of 2008, five lawsuits were filed against the state of California to stop scheduled reductions in provider payments in the state’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal. A cross-cutting theme of these lawsuits is the theory that Medi-Cal rate cuts violate the "equal access" statute, a federal law which requires payment to Medicaid providers to be "sufficient to enlist enough providers so that care and services are available under the plan at least to the extent that such care and services are available to the general population in the geographic area." The theory is that low or reduced Medicaid provider payment rates may act as a disincentive to provider participation in Medicaid programs, hence compromising beneficiary access to health care. Lacking clear federal guidance on such matters, plaintiffs have turned to the courts in attempts to challenge rate-setting methodologies and low reimbursement rates. The analysis is available at is available at http://www.chcf.org/topics/medi-cal/index.cfm?itemID=134108.
Professor Rosenbaum also published "Medicaid and National Health Care Reform" in the October 14 NEJM Perspective section. The article looks at the pivotal role Medicaid plays in national healthcare reform as Congress, with White House support, is poised to eliminate coverage restrictions for poor, non-elderly adults by eliminating Medicaid’s categorical restrictions on this population. The free full text of the article is available at http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=2072&query=home
Christine Ferguson, J.D., research professor, and Anna Muldoon, M.P.H. cand., research assistant, published "Not All are Created Equal: Differences in Obesity Attitudes Between Men and Women" in the Sept./Oct. 2009 issue of the journal Women’s Health Issues. The invited commentary, written on behalf of the STOP Obesity Alliance, explores sources and effects of stigma in several environments including the workplace and physicians offices, and attitudinal differences between men and women when it comes to obesity interventions and perceptions. the commentary is available at http://www.whijournal.com/article/S1049-3867(09)00069-3/fulltext
DHP research professor Julia Hidalgo, Sc.D., M.S.W., M.P.H., and researchers from Thomson Reuters, the Veterans Administration, and the Massachusetts General Hospital published "A four-system comparison of patients with chronic illness: the Military Health System, Veterans Health Administration, Medicaid, and commercial plans in Military Medicine 174(9).
DHP New Publication - Using Primary Care to Bend the Cost Curve: The Potential Impact of Health Center Expansion in Senate Reforms
15/10/2009
An analysis of provisions to expand health insurance coverage now under consideration in the Senate has been released by The Geiger Gibson/RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services.“Using Primary Care to Bend the Cost Curve: The Potential Impact of Health Center Expansion in Senate Reforms” supplements earlier analyses of the impact of Medicaid expansions and increased federal funding for community health centers under consideration in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Two important pieces of legislation are currently under consideration in the Senate.Draft health reform legislation passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee includes provisions to substantially expand federal health center funding (S. 1679) while the current Senate Finance Committee bill would also institute a number of reforms to expand health insurance coverage. As the two measures are merged, we found that one plausible scenario is a consolidated measure that follows the Senate Finance Committee’s insurance reforms while including the Senate HELP Committee’s provisions that address prevention and wellness, and expand health center funding. We found that the combination of expanded health insurance coverage and investments in the expansion of community health centers can produce substantial savings of $369 billion for the overall health care system and $105 billion for the federal portion of Medicaid over the next decade. By expanding health centers, the two principal goals of health reform - reducing the number of uninsured and creating a more efficient system of health care that improves quality of care while "bending the curve" of future health care expenditures -can be achieved.
Geiger Gibson/RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative analyses are available at:
For more information about the Geiger Gibson Program in Community Health Policy and the GG/RCHN CHF Research Collaborative, contact Peter Shin at 202.994.4144 or pshin@gwu.edu
