Faculty

Sally Moody

Sally Moody

Professor of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology

Office Phone: 202-994-2878
Email:
Department: Anatomy and Regenerative Biology

Education

  • BA, Goucher College, 1973
  • MS, University of Maryland, 1976
  • PhD, University of Florida, 1981

Biography

Curriculum Vitae

Current Lab Members

Past Lab Members

  • Dr. Tammy Awtry, Postdoctoral Scientist
  • Dr. Daniel Bauer, Internal Medicine, Private practice
  • Dr. Samantha Brugmann, Assistant Professor, Cincinnati Children's Hospital
  • Dr. Zoya Demidenko, Research Assistant Professor, NY College of Medicine
  • Dr. Kathleen E. Dennis, Research Scientist, Vanderbuilt University
  • Dr. Betty C. Gallagher, Research Scientist, University of Virginia
  • Dr. Stephen Gee, Postdoctoral Fellow, Johns Hopkins University
  • Dr. Alexandra Hainski-Brousseau, Lecturer, DePaul University, UCLA
  • Dr. Sen Huang, Director, Huang Clinic, Washington, DC
  • Dr. Kristy L. Kenyon, Associate Professor, Hobart and William Smith Colleges
  • Dr. Kathryn B. Moore, Research Associate Professor, University of Utah
  • Dr. Petra D. Pandur, Group Leader, University Ulm, Germany
  • Dr. Steven A. Sullivan, Bioinformatics Specialist, New York University
  • Dr. Norann Zaghloul, Assistant Professor, University of Maryland
  • Bo Yan, M.D., Ph.D., Director, Translational Medical Research, Nanjing Medical College

Teaching

  • ANAT 221 - Advanced Topics in Stem Cell Biology
  • ANAT 222 - Advanced Research in Stem Cell Biology
  • BMSC 8212 - Developmental Cell Biology
  • IDIS 212 - Medical Neurobiology
  • ANAT 130 - Human Embryology

Research

The Role of Maternal Determinant Molecules in Establishing Neural Fates

Using cell lineage analyses, single blastomere transplantation and culture, PCR analyses and gene mis-expression, we showed that dorsal-animal maternal molecules bias one side of the embryo to acquire a dorsal fate shortly after fertilization. Dorsal axis-inducing activity can be activated by an activin-like signal and by localized polyadenylation between the 8- and 16-cell stages. Ventrally localized Wnt8b signaling antagonizes this dorsal-axis activity. Noggin signaling from animal blastomeres promotes a neural fate in vegetal equatorial cells. Recently, we identified 40 unique mRNAs that are enriched in the animal blastomeres using a microarray approach. We are functionally characterizing a number of these to discover whether they bias cells towards a neural fate.

  • Grant, P.A., M.B. Herold and S.A. Moody (2013) Blastomere explants to test for cell fate commitment during embryonic development. Journal of Visualized Experiments (71) e4458, doi: 10.3791/44584. Link
  • Grant, P.A., Yan, B., Johnson, M.A., Johnson, D.L.E., and S.A. Moody (2013). Novel animal pole-enriched maternal mRNAs are preferentially expressed in neural ectoderm. Developmental Dynamics. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24082 Link.
  • Gallagher, B.C., A.M. Hainski and S.A. Moody. (1991) Autonomous differentiation of dorsal axial structures from an animal cap cleavage stage blastomere in Xenopus. Development 112: 1103-1114. Link
  • Hainski, A. M. and S.A. Moody. (1992) Xenopus maternal RNAs from a dorsal animal blastomere induce a secondary axis in host embryos. Development 116: 347-355. Link
  • Hainski, A.M. and S.A. Moody (1996) An activin-like signal activates a dorsal-specifying RNA between the 8- and 16-cell stages of Xenopus. Developmental Genetics 19: 210-221. Link
  • Pandur, P.D., S.A. Sullivan and S.A. Moody (2002) Multiple maternal influences on dorsal-ventral fate in Xenopus animal blastomeres. Developmental Dynamics 225:581-587. Link
  • Huang, H., B. Yan, S.A. Sullivan and S.A. Moody (2007). Noggin signaling from Xenopus animal blastomere lineages promotes a neural fate in neighboring vegetal blastomere lineages. Developmental Dynamics 236: 171-183. Link

We cloned two maternal genes (foxD5, flotillin1) and are studying their functions in establishing neural fate in dorsal, animal lineages. For a description of FoxD5, please see: A gene regulatory network involved in neural plate development.

Flotillin1 is a member of a family of membrane-associated proteins of unknown function that are highly expressed in the nervous system. These proteins are highly enriched in growing axons. There are three Xenopus alleles (flotillin 1a, 1b, 1c) that have very similar expression profiles. Flotillin1 is expressed during oogenesis and transcripts become enriched in the animal hemisphere precursors of the embryonic ectoderm. Zygotic transcripts are expressed in the presumptive neural plate, with lower levels in the non-neural ectoderm. At neural tube closure, Flotillin1 is expressed in the entire telencephalon, dorsal domains of the rest of the neural tube and dorsal paraxial mesoderm. Primary sensory neurons (Rohon-Beard cells) express Flotillin1 at particularly high levels. At tail bud stages, placodal and branchial arch structures additionally express Flotillin1. While flotillin1 has been implicated in axon regeneration, its function during early development is not known.

Pandur, P.D., M.L. Dirksen, K.B. Moore and S.A. Moody. (2004) Xenopus flotillin1 gene highly expressed in the nervous system and the maternal precursors of the nervous system. Developmental Dynamics 231:881-887. Link

A Gene Regulatory Network Involved in Neural Plate Development

In a screen designed to identify animal localized maternal mRNAs (see: "The role of maternal determinant molecules in establishing neural fates" above), we cloned foxD5, which is a member of the forkhead/winged helix transcription factor family. FoxD5 (also known as foxD4L1) is expressed maternally during oogenesis, and maternal transcripts are confined to the animal hemisphere precursors of the embryonic ectoderm. In over-expression and animal cap assays, it activates dorsal axis genes, both neural and muscle, and induces a secondary axis. foxD5 also is expressed zygotically in the presumptive neural ectoderm and neural plate. It is induced strongly by Siamois and Cerberus, but only weakly by neural inducers(Noggin, Chordin). Over-expression assays show that FoxD5 expands Sox2+ neural plate stem cells and represses neural differentiation genes. Its expression is down-regulated as the neural tube closes and differentiation begins. We demonstrated that foxD5 acts upstream of numerous co-expressed neural plate genes, some of which stabilize a neural ectodermal fate and some of which initiate neural differentiation. Together these genes define a regulatory network that establishes the neural ectoderm and controls the onset of neural differentiation.

  • Neilson, K.M., S.L. Klein, P. Mhaske, K. Mood, I.O. Daar and S.A. Moody. (2012) Specific domains of FoxD4/5 activate and repress neural transcription factor genes to control the progression of immature neural ectoderm to differentiating neural plate. Developmental Biology 365: 363-375. Link
  • Klein, S.L., K.M. Neilson, J. Orban, S. Yaklichkin, J. Hoffbauer, K. Mood, I.O. Daar and S.A. Moody (2013). Conserved structural domains in FoxD4L1, a neural forkhead box transcription factor, are required to repress or activate target genes. PLoS One 10.1371/journal.pone.0061845.  Link.
  • Moody, S.A., S. L. Klein, B. A. Karpinski, T. M. Maynard and A.-S. LaMantia (2013) “On becoming neural: what the embryo can tell us about differentiating neural stem cells.” Amer. J. Stem Cells 2: 74-94. Link
  • Sullivan, S.A., L. Akers and S.A. Moody (2001).  foxD5a, a Xenopus winged helix gene, maintains an immature neural ectoderm via transcriptional repression that is dependent upon the C-terminal domain. Developmental Biology 232: 439-457. Link
  • Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2009) Notch signaling downstream of foxD5 promotes neural ectodermal transcription factors that repress neural differentiation. Developmental Dynamics 238: 1358-1365. Link
  • Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2009) FoxD5 plays a critical upstream role in regulating neural fate and onset of differentiation. Developmental Biology 329: 80-95. Link
  • Rogers, C.D., S.A. Moody and E.S. Casey (2009) “Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate” Birth Defects Research part C: Embryo Today 87: 249-262. Link
  • Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2010) Microarray identification of novel downstream targets of FoxD5, a critical component of the neural ectodermal transcriptional network. Developmental Dynamics 239: 3467-3480. Link

Specification of Cranial Placode Ectoderm

Placodes are ectodermal specializations in the vertebrate head that contribute to each of the sensory systems (olfactory epithelium, lens, vestibular-acoustic organs and ganglia, cranial ganglia and lateral line). We cloned a member of the Six gene family (six1) that is expressed in the embryonic precursor of the placodes, the pre-placodal ectoderm (PPE). This gene is highly expressed in all neurogenic cranial placodes and lateral line primordia from neurula to tadpole stages.  We used markers of the PPE to show that low concentrations of neural inducers (e.g., Noggin, Chordin) are necessary to induce the PPE and that posteriorizing signals (e.g., Wnt, FGF) repress six1 so it is expressed only in the head. Over-expression of six1 expands the PPE at the expense of neural crest and epidermis, whereas knock-down of Six1 protein results in reduction of the PPE domain and expansion of the neural plate, neural crest and epidermis. Using activator and repressor constructs of six1 or co-expression of wild-type six1 with activating (eya1) or repressing (groucho) co-factors, we demonstrated that Six1 inhibits neural crest and epidermis genes via transcriptional repression and enhances PPE genes via transcriptional activation. Ectopic expression of neural plate, neural crest and epidermal genes in the PPE demonstrates that these factors mutually influence each other to establish the appropriate boundaries between these ectodermal domains. We are continuing to examine the upstream regulators of six1 expression and the down-stream target genes.

In collaboration with Gerhart Schlosser and Mike Klymkowski, we studied whether six1 plays a role in controlling cell proliferation and differentiation during later placode development. six1 is expressed in both superficial and sensorial layers of the neurogenic placodes beginning at mid-gastrula stages, but the neuronal derivatives turn off six1 expression as they migrate away from the placodal region. We showed that both Six1 and Eya1 are required for neural differentiation in all neurogenic placodes. At high levels of expression, Six1 and Eya1 expand the expression of SoxB1 genes, maintain cells in proliferative state and block expression of neuronal differentiation genes. At lower levels, they promote neuronal diferentiation.

The transcriptional activity of Six proteins can be modified by co-factor proteins, the best characterized being Eya and Groucho proteins. We searched the Xenopus genome for orthologues of Drosphila co-factor proteins that interact with the fly six-related factor SO. We identified 33 Xenopus genes with high sequence identity to 20 fly proteins and demonstrate that a large number of these are expressed in cranofacial tissues that express Six1.

  • Gee, S.T., S.L. Milgram, K.L. Kramer, F.L. Conlon and S.A. Moody. (2011) Yes-associated protein 65 (YAP) expands neural progenitors and regulates pax3 expression in the neural plate border zone. PLoS One 10.1371/journal.pone.0020309. Link
  • Pandur, P., and S.A. Moody (2000). Xenopus six1 gene is expressed in neurogenic cranial placodes and maintained in differentiating lateral lines. Mechanisms of Development 96: 253-257. Link
  • Brugmann, S.A., P.D. Pandur, K.L. Kenyon, F. Pignoni and S.A. Moody (2004). Six1 promotes a placodal fate within the lateral neurogenic ectoderm by functioning as both a transcriptional activator and repressor. Development 131: 5871-5881. Link
  • Brugmann, S.A. and S.A. Moody (2005). Induction and specification of the vertebrate ectodermal placodes: precursors of the cranial sensory organs. Biol. Cell 97: 303-319. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (2007). Determination of pre-placodal ectoderm and sensory placodes. In: Principles in Developmental Genetics. Elsevier, NY, pp. 590-614. PDF
  • Schlosser, G., T. Awtry, S.A. Brugmann, ED. Jensen, K.M. Neilson, G. Ruan, A. Stammler, D. Voelker, B.Yan, C. Zhang, M.W. Klymkowsky, and S.A. Moody. (2008). Eya1 and Six1 promote neurogenesis in the cranial placodes in a SoxB1?dependent fashion. Developmental Biology 320:199?214.Link
  • Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2010) Microarray identification of novel downstream targets of FoxD5, a critical component of the neural ectodermal transcriptional network. Developmental Dynamics 239: 3467-3480. Link
  • Neilson, K.M., F. Pignoni, B. Yan and S.A. Moody. (2010) Developmental expression patterns of candidate co-factors for vertebrate Six family transcription factors. Developmental Dynamics 239: 3446-3466. Link

Specification of Retinal Stem Cells and Amacrine Cell Phenotypes

The ability of embryonic cells to give rise to the retina is influenced by both maternal molecules and cell-cell interactions throughout development. We demonstrated that maternal asymmetries that set up the three embryonic germ layers (ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm) influence whether an embryonic cell can give rise to retina. Vegetally localized factors that promote endo-mesoderm formation also antagonize neural and retinal fates involving the Derriere signaling pathway.  Those blastomeres that do give rise to the retina are selected from the pool of competent blastomeres by residing in a region of the embryo where BMP signaling is highly repressed.

  • Moore, K.B. and S.A. Moody (1999). Animal-vegetal asymmetries influence the earliest steps in retinal fate commitment in Xenopus. Developmental Biology 212:25-41. Link
  • Zaghloul, N.A., Yan, B. and S.A. Moody (2005). “Step-wise specification of retinal stem cells during normal embryogenesis” Biol. Cell 97:321-337. Link
  • Yan, B. and S.A. Moody (2007). The competence of Xenopus blastomeres to produce neural and retinal progeny is repressed by two endo-mesoderm promoting pathways.  Developmental Biology 305:103-119. Link
  • During gastrulation retinal stem cells are selected from the pool of retina-competent precursors to form the definitive eye fields.  Cells in the eye fields express several transcription factors that specify their retinal fate. We have shown that eye-specific transcription factors and ephrinB1-FGF signaling influence which embryonic cells are able to move into the eye field.  We also have shown that two of these factors, Rx1 and Pax6, differentially influence whether a cell maintains an immature retinal stem cell state or becomes a more restricted retinal progenitor cell. 
  • Kenyon, K.L., N. Zaghloul and S.A. Moody (2001). Transcription factors of the anterior neural plate alter cell movements of epidermal progenitors to specify a retinal fate. Developmental Biology 240: 77-91. Link
  • Moore, K.B., K. Mood, I.O. Daar and S.A. Moody (2004). Morphogenetic movements underlying eye field formation require interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 signaling pathways. Developmental Cell 6: 55-67.Link
  • Lee, H.-S., Y.-S. Bong, K B. Moore, K. Soria, S.A. Moody and I.O. Daar (2006). Dishevelled mediates ephrinB1 signaling in the eye field via the planar cell polarity pathway.  Nature Cell Biology 8: 55-63. Link
  • Zaghloul, N.A. and S.A. Moody (2007). Alterations of rx1 and pax6 expression levels at neural plate stages differentially affect the production of retinal cell types and maintenance of retinal stem cell qualities. Developmental Biology 306: 222-240. Link

Using cell lineage analyses, neurotransmitter-specific immunocytochemistry, and confocal microscopy, we determined the cell lineage origin of different neurotransmitter subtypes of amacrine neurons.  Using single cell transplantation and gene mis-expression techniques, we demonstrated some of the interactions and transcription factors necessary to produce these specific phenotypes.

  • Moody, S.A. (2012) “Targeted microinjection of synthetic mRNAs to alter retina gene expression in Xenopus embryos.” In: Methods in Molecular Biology: Retinal Development  884: 91-111. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (2012) “Testing retina fate commitment in Xenopus by blastomere deletion, transplantation and explant culture.” In: Methods in Molecular Biology: Retinal Development 884: 115-127. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1993). The retinal fate of Xenopus cleavage stage progenitors is dependent upon blastomere position and competence: Studies of normal and regulated clones. J. Neuroscience 13: 3193-3210. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1995). Asymmetrical blastomere origin and spatial domains of dopamine and Neuropeptide Y amacrine cells in Xenopus tadpole retina. J. Comparative Neurology 360: 2-13. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1997). Three types of serotonin-containing amacrine cells in the tadpole retina have distinct clonal origins. J. Comparative Neurology 387: 42-52. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1998). Dual expression of GABA or serotonin and dopamine in Xenopus amacrine cells is transient and may be regulated by laminar cues. Visual Neuroscience 15: 969-977. Link
  • Moody, S.A., I. Chow and S. Huang (2000). Intrinsic bias and lineage restriction in the phenotype determination of dopamine and neuropeptide Y amacrine cells. J. Neuroscience 20: 3244-3253. Link
  • Zaghloul, N.A. and S.A. Moody (2007). Changes in Rx1 and Pax6 activity at eye field stages differentially alter the production of amacrine neurotransmitter subtypes in Xenopus. Molecular Vision 13: 86-95. Link

The Upstream Regulatory Regions of a Neuron-Specific β-tubulin Gene

By immunocytochemistry we and collaborators showed that the Class III β-tubulin gene is expressed only in neurons beginning at the time that they go through their terminal cell division. Therefore, this gene is likely to be regulated by proteins that establish neuronal cell fate. We cloned the upstream sequences of this gene in rat and analyzed in silico which regions are likely to be involved in neuron-specific expression.

  • Moody, S.A., M.S. Quigg and A Frankfurter (1989). Development of the peripheral trigeminal system in the chick revealed by an isotype-specific anti-beta-tubulin monoclonal antibody.  J. Comparative Neurology 279: 567-580. Link
  • Moody, S.A., V. Miller, A. Spanos and A. Franfurter (1996). Developmental expression of neuron-specific beta-tubulin in frog (Xenopus laevis); a marker for growing axons during the embryonic period.  J. Comparative Neurology 364: 219-230. Link
  • Dennis, K., M. Uittenbogaard, A. Chiaramello, and S.A. Moody (2002). The promoter region of the rat neuron-specific Class III beta-tubulin gene contains several proximal elements that may regulate neuron specific expression. Gene 294: 269-277. Link   

To acquire a mammalian neuron-specific anti-beta-tubulin monoclonal antibody, visit this Link.

To acquire the frog neuron-specific anti-beta-tubulin monoclonal antibody, contact Dr. Anthony Frankfurter at the University of Virginia.

To acquire clones of the rat neuron-specific Class III beta-tubulin gene upstream sequences, contact Dr. Moody.

Fate Maps in Xenopus laevis

The first use of intracellular lineage tracers to make fate maps in Xenopus was published by Marcus Jacobson and Giro Hirose (1978, Science 202: 637-639).

The following articles contain the fate maps of Xenopus laevis blastomeres and specific neuronal phenotypes.

  • Lee, H.-S., Sokol, S.Y., Moody, S.A, and I. O. Daar (2012)Using 32-cell stage Xenopus embryos to probe PCP signaling.” In: Methods in Molecular Biology: PCP Methods and Protocols  839: 91-104. Link 
  • Jacobson, M. and G. Hirose (1978). Origin of the retina from both sides of the embryonic brain: A contribution to the problem of crossing at the optic chiasma. Science 202: 637-639. Link
  • Hirose, G. and M. Jacobson (1979). Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog. I. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 16-cell and earlier stages. Developmental Biology 71: 191-202. Link
  • Jacobson, M. and G. Hirose (1981). Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog II. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 32- and 64-cell stages. J. Neuroscience 1: 271-284. Link
  • Jacobson, M. (1983). Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog. III. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 128- , 256- , and 512-cell stages. J. Neuroscience 3:1019-1038. Link
  • Jacobson, M. and S.A. Moody (1984). Quantitative lineage analysis of the frog's nervous system. I. Lineages of Rohon-Beard neurons and primary motoneurons. J. Neuroscience 4: 1361-1369. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (1987). Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Developmental Biology 119: 560-578. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (1987). Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Developmental Biology 122: 300-319. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (1989). Quantitative lineage analysis of the origin of frog primary motor and sensory neurons from cleavage stage blastomeres. J. Neuroscience 9: 2919-2930. Link
  • Moody, S.A. and M.J. Kline (1990). Segregation of fate during cleavage of frog (Xenopus laevis) blastomeres. Anatomy & Embryology 182: 347-362. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1992). Does lineage determine the dopamine phenotype in the tadpole hypothalamus: A quantitative analysis. J. Neuroscience 12: 1351-1362. Link
  • Huang, S. and S.A. Moody (1993). The retinal fate of Xenopus cleavage stage progenitors is dependent upon blastomere position and competence: Studies of normal and regulated clones. J. Neuroscience 13: 3193-3210. Link
  • Bauer, D.V., S. Huang and S.A. Moody (1994). The cleavage stage origin of Spemann's Organizer: Analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus. Development 120: 1179-1189. Link
  • Moody, S.A. (1999) Testing the Cell Fate Commitment of Single Blastomeres in Xenopus laevis. In: Advances in Molecular Biology, (ed., J. Richter), Oxford University Press, pp. 355-381.
  • Moody, S.A. (1999) "Cell Lineage Analysis in Xenopus Embryos" In: Methods in Molecular Biology: Developmental Biology Protocols, (ed., R.S. Tuan and C.W. Lo) Humana Press, v 135, pp 1-17.

Publications

View publications by this faculty member from January 1, 2013 - present

Moody, S.A. and Saint-Jeannet, J.-P. (2014) “Determination of pre-placodal ectoderm and sensory placodes.” Developmental Biology (under review)

Moody, S.A., Klein S.L., Karpinksi B.A., Maynard T.M. and LaMantia, A.-S. (2013) “On becoming neural: what the embryo can tell us about differentiating neural stem cells.” Amer. J. Stem Cells 2: 74-94. Link

Grant, P.A., Herold, M.B., and Moody, S.A. (2013) “Blastomere explants to test for cell fate commitment during embryonic development.” Journal of Visualized Experiments (71)e4458, doi: 10.3791/4458 Link

Klein, S.L., Neilson, K.M., Orban, J. Yaklichkin, S., Hoffbauer, J., Mood, K., Daar, I.O. and Moody, S.A. (2013) “Conserved structural domains in FoxD4L1, a neural forkhead box transcription factor, are required to repress or activate target genes.” Plos One Link

Neilson, K.M., Klein S.L., Mhaske, P., Mood, K., Daar, I.O. and Moody, S.A. (2012) “Specific domains of FoxD4-5 activate and repress neural transcription factor gfenes to control the progression of immature neural ectoderm to differentiating neural plate.” Developmental Biology 365: 363-375. Link

Neilson, K.M. and S.A. Moody (2012) “Developmental organogenesis” In: Regenerative Medicine. (Eds., E. Scott and R. C. Fisher) Jones and Bartlett Publishers LLC., Boston, MA. (in press).

Lee, H.-S., Sokol, S.Y., Moody, S.A, and I. O. Daar (2012) “Using 32-cell stage Xenopus embryos to probe PCP signaling.” In: Methods in Molecular Biology: PCP Methods and Protocols. Humana Press (in press).

Moody, S.A. (2012) “Targeted microinjection of synthetic mRNAs to alter retina gene expression in Xenopus embryos.” Methods in Molecular Biology: Retinal Development 884: 91-111. Link

Moody, S.A. (2012) “Testing retina fate commitment in Xenopus by blastomere deletion, transplantation and explant culture.” Methods in Molecular Biology: Retinal Development 884: 115-127. Link

Gee, S.T., S.L. Milgram, K.L. Kramer, F.L. Conlon and S.A. Moody. (2011) Yes-associated protein 65 (YAP) expands neural progenitors and regulates pax3 expression in the neural plate border zone. "PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20309. Epub 2011 Jun 8". Link

Neilson, K.M., F. Pignoni, B. Yan and S.A. Moody. (2010) Developmental expression patterns of candidate co-factors for vertebrate Six family transcription factors. Developmental Dynamics 239: 3446-3466. Link

Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2010) Microarray identification of novel downstream targets of FoxD5, a critical component of the neural ectodermal transcriptional network. Developmental Dynamics 239: 3467-3480. Link

Rogers, C.D., S.A. Moody and E.S. Casey (2009) “Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate” Birth Defects Research part C: Embryo Today 87: 249-262. Link

Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2009) Notch signaling downstream of foxD5 promotes neural ectodermal transcription factors that repress neural differentiation. Developmental Dynamics 238: 1358-1365. Link

Yan, B., K.M. Neilson and S.A. Moody. (2009) FoxD5 plays a critical upstream role in regulating neural fate and onset of differentiation. Developmental Biology 329: 80-95. Link

Additional publications published before January 1, 2013 may be available within Himmelfarb Library's database.



The School of Medicine & Health Sciences

Ross Hall
2300 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
Phone: (202) 994-2987 | Fax: (202) 994-0926